How it Works

One question or a full circuit.
Your prep, your pace.

Deepmock has two modes: quick solo reps when you have 10 minutes, or a full MMI circuit when you want the real thing. Both record. Both give feedback. Both build the muscle.

Two modes. One practice loop.

Start with a single question or run a full circuit. The feedback loop is the same either way.

Solo

Solo mode
01
Pick a question
Shuffle for something random, or browse by category - ethics, communication, situational, and more.
02
Choose your recording mode
Mic only for faster uploads and more privacy, or camera and mic to practice your on-camera presence.
03
Record your answer
No timer pressure. Hit record, answer the question, stop when you are done.
04
Review and share
Watch or listen back. Submit for free peer review, or get AI analysis depending on your plan.

MMI Circuit

MMI mode
01
Build your circuit
Add up to 5 stations. Choose categories like Teamwork, Communication, or Critical Thinking - or go fully random.
02
Set your timing
Reading time: 1, 2, or 3 minutes (or unlimited). Answering time: 3 to 10 minutes. Hard stop keeps you honest.
03
Run the circuit
Each station opens with a reading phase. Your camera starts when you begin answering - just like the real thing.
04
Review all stations
Each station gets its own feedback. See where you are strong and where to focus next.
Base analysis

Strengths, gaps, and the exact moments they happened.

Every session opens with a performance summary - what you did well, what to focus on next, and an overall score. Below it, every note pins back to the second it happened in the transcript.

  • Specific praise tied to what you said, not generic checklists
  • Focus items written as actions, not vague 'be more empathetic'
  • Click any timestamp to jump straight to that moment
Performance summary
Key takeaways from your response
What you did wellKeep it up
Demonstrates a patient-centered communication style by allowing the patient to speak freely without interruption to gather comprehensive information.
Prioritizes patient safety by explicitly mentioning the need to rule out sinister diseases and red flag symptoms early in the process.
Focus nextFocus here
1Could benefit from mentioning the 'biopsychosocial model' to explore if psychological or social factors are contributing to the vague physical symptoms.
2Lacks mention of specific Australian healthcare contexts, such as utilizing multidisciplinary teams or specific diagnostic pathways common in local practice.
Timeline notes
0:24
Strong red-flag screening early - ruled out cardiac causes before moving on
0:54
Vague description of the physical exam
1:18
Missed the psychosocial context - no exploration of patient's ideas, concerns or expectations
1:37
Frequent 'uh' and 'um' interrupting your reasoning
1:55
Good use of 'watchful waiting' - showed clinical judgment about when time itself is diagnostic
Example Transcript
So my approach to, uh, this sort of patient would be to first start broadly and then narrow in, uh, on specific, uh, systems and symptoms depending on, uh, the information that I've received. So firstly, I would allow the patient to speak, uh, freely. I wouldn't interrupt them, just to get as much information as I possibly can. I would then, uh, start asking questions depending on the history I've gotten so far to help to rule in and rule out, uh, different diagnoses with a particular focus on sinister diseases and red flag symptoms. Uh, following, I would take a systems-based approach for this, uh, so addressing the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal, uh, etc. Following this, I would do a targeted examination, uh, to help with my - to help give me more information. And then depending on where things are at this point, I would potentially involve colleagues to see if there's any other information, uh, or diagnosis that I have missed or not considered. I would then order investigations to help me, uh, to help provide me more information in to, uh, confirm and my diet, my provision diagnosis, and rule out, uh, uh, key, uh, differential diagnoses. If at this point I still have not gotten an answer and the patient has vague symptoms, uh, I would Firstly, reassure the patient that we have ruled out any sinister causes for the symptoms, and then focus on, uh, treating the symptoms themselves and trying to relieve the symptoms and see if the patient improves, uh, with time. Uh, and depending on how things go, uh, I might - I may end up, uh, referring the patient on to a specialist in an area that I believe would help to further, uh, work out what the cause of the symptoms are.
Word count: 303
STRENGTHIMPROVENOTE
Rubric breakdown

Every score points back to the words you said.

Core criteria are set by the station category each has its own marksheet. On top of that, every station adds rows tuned to what it specifically tests. Each row gives you the score, and what to practise next.

  • Category criteria stay constant - compare clinical-reasoning runs head-to-head over time
  • Station-specific rows surface what this particular question tested
  • Every row reads as advice you can act on, not a number out of context
Rubric breakdown
Clinical reasoning · Vague abdominal pain
Overall / 100
Strong78
Scenario prompt

A 45-year-old presents to your GP clinic with intermittent abdominal pain over the past six weeks. They describe it as dull and unpredictable, with no clear trigger. Vitals are within normal range and they have no significant past medical history. Walk me through how you would approach this patient, from the moment they sit down to your initial management plan.

Category criteria · Clinical reasoning
Problem analysis
7/10

Frame the problem before solving it - structured history first, then targeted exam, then investigations, then plan. The strongest answers also map the patient's ICE (ideas, concerns, expectations) and psychosocial context, not just the biology. Skipping this reads as exam-mode pattern matching, which examiners notice almost immediately.

Logical reasoning
7/10

Each step should follow from the last with no contradictions. A common trap is calling for a 'targeted exam' immediately after admitting the symptoms are vague - if you don't know what you're targeting, the exam can't be targeted. Narrate the logic out loud so the examiner can follow why you moved from one step to the next.

Communication
8/10

Patient-centered openings - introducing yourself, checking what they prefer to be called, signposting what you're about to do - build trust before any clinical content lands. Filler words like 'uh' and 'um' fragment the rhythm of your reasoning and read as uncertainty even when your content is solid. Slow down rather than fill silence.

Station-specific
Differential breadth
8/10

Name specific differentials grouped by system rather than gesturing vaguely at 'sinister causes'. For abdominal pain that might be cardiac (ACS referring to the epigastrium), GI (peptic ulcer, biliary, appendicitis), MSK, or gynae. Examiners read breadth as a signal of how deeply you've thought, not just how widely.

Red-flag & safety-net awareness
9/10

Screen for red flags early and revisit them as your differential narrows - this is the difference between safe and dangerous practice. Strong candidates also build in a safety net: telling the patient explicitly what would warrant return and what timeline to expect. Don't treat red flags as a one-time checklist at the start.

Category criteria
Set by the station type
Actionable rationale
What to practise next, per row
Peer review

Share your answer, get real eyes on it.

Send a recording to other applicants or your own tutor with one link. They drop comments straight on the session - no account, no extra tools, no losing feedback in a chat app.

  • Share with peers or invite a tutor by link - no account needed on their side
  • Expire or revoke the link any time, so nothing stays out there longer than you want
  • Comments thread on the session itself, not buried in DMs or email
Comments
Tutor#4b21ac
Strong opening - you framed the ethical tension clearly before jumping into the action plan. Would push you to name the patient autonomy principle explicitly at 01:14.
May 19, 2026 - 14:08 PM
Peer#9a6464
I had this same station last week - your structure is tighter than mine was. The handover to the consultant felt rushed though, try slowing the last 20 seconds.
May 19, 2026 - 22:41 PM
Add Comment
Write your comment here...
Submit
Everything included

All the tools to prepare you as thoroughly as possible.

Every add-on and feature we build is designed to close one gap between where you are and where you need to be on interview day.

Self-recording

Record video and audio in-browser. Watch yourself back - the most uncomfortable, most useful step in interview prep.

Real MMI scenarios

Teamwork, communication, ethics, empathy, motivation, critical thinking, healthcare issues, and de-technicalise - written by practising doctors so the scenarios feel like the real thing, not textbook exercises.

Track every category

See your score per domain over time. Spot the weak ones early, drill them, watch the curve climb.

Try one station, free.

No card, no signup wall - just a real prompt, a real timer, and a recording you can keep.

Start a Free Station